Mild Weather in June

Took awhile, but I finished reading “Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions,” by Karen Armstrong (heavy duty reading on comparative religion analyses), in addition to Qiu Xiaolong’s “Red Mandarin Dress” (a Chief Inspector Chen Cao novel; interesting read; still wish Chief Inspector Chen had more of a personality).

Slate commentary on an anti-drug cartoon of my generation; what’s scary is that I remembered watching it during that late 1980’s/early 1990’s period – where the Muppet Babies, Alf, the Chipmunks etc., convince this idiot kid to Say No To Drugs. Upon review, yes, Slate, you’re right – it was a lame cartoon, but it was one of those rare opportunities to see so many characters in one place and at one time – and all acting very patronizing and pedantic… yes, even Alf.

Goodbye to Analog TV; Time with a photo gallery to honor ye olde television. I’m not entirely certain about digital tv, but here goes nothing.

Also, another end of an era: goodbye to the Virgin Megastore. Admittedly, I didn’t shop there very much, but I am concerned by the loss of a big retailer and the lack of commerce in a huge amount of real estate in the city.

Time Magazine poses the question of whether Facebook hurts the school reunion industry. I thought Facebook actually helped my college’s 10th year reunion; people came. It’s hard to tell if that will generate donations for Alma Mater or if the alumni office is really out of business because of Facebook, but that depends on what one thinks is the purpose of reunions and alumni offices, I think.

Hmm, so every time Time Magazine comments on Facebook, so does Newsweek? Well, at least Newsweek tries to remind people that Facebook is only a supplement to enhancing your friendships, not replace them.

Why am I a sucker for cop shows that get cancelled? I like “The Unusuals”; enjoyed watching the leftover episodes. It’s too bad that ABC won’t give it a shot.

The articles on Judge Sonia Sotomayor have been interesting, to say the least. Count on Tom Goldstein of Scotusblog to review all of the racial discrimination appellate cases that Judge Sotomayor sat in (Scotusblog is awfully known for being thorough) and finding that there’s no so-called bias in Sotomayor’s decision-making. Goldstein’s key conclusion: “The public debate ought to be about what the law should command in these kinds of difficult cases. Unsubstantiated charges of racism distract us from these questions and demeans our justice system.”

For a country that doesn’t quite like America, Iran apparently likes the English language, sort of – as the Slate Explainer explains.

Slate’s John Dickerson ponders on President Obama’s response to the Iran situation, which is still developing and with no certain answers regarding the elections (at least, not to people outside Iran, anyway). So, query: how do you respond to a still developing situation? Answer: Very carefully, whether the American people, or the world at large, likes it or not.

That is really fascinating: Obama’s the first president of a generation that grew up watching Sesame Street, not just a parent of kids who watched it? The first generation of Sesame Street watched 1960’s tv at its most diverse and optimistic (and oddly entertaining, in that 1960’s way; Obama was the first generation that grew up watching Star Trek too) – this all pretty much sums up Obama. This was an awesome article on Time.com, plus great accompanying video of Obama praising Sesame Street.

It must be a slow news day if we get excited over President Obama’s killing a fly; well, it was kind of impressive.

History

And… we’re off! President Obama has nominated Judge Sonia Sotomayor for the US Supreme Court. Best wishes for smooth sailing through confirmation in Congress (as much as can be possible) to Judge Sotomayor! We could have the first Hispanic/Latina in the S.Ct. She’s a New Yorker, too (the Bronx, specifically), who saved baseball from perpetuating that last strike – so pretty darn cool. (well, not to mention other great stuff, like having been a prosecutor and been in private practice, plus attending Princeton and Yale Law).

Much to read; hopefully I won’t drive myself up the wall with the coverage, as I was during the last bunch of confirmations. Good stuff so far, as Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick observes that it’s rather pointless to go after Judge Sotomayor for being human (therefore has feelings and stuff like that; one would think that we must have androids or Vulcans be Supreme Court justices).

But recall such fun blog posts regarding past S.Ct. nominees…

Ex., as in the days of the Alito confirmation, with us having a rather curious future – where you’re not sure who your justice is until a few years pass).

Let’s not forget the Harriet Miers stuff, much of which wasn’t all that praiseworthy (I mean, really – she was thought of as an “inkblot” – and not in a positive way; come on, she wasn’t that bad; she just wasn’t meant to be a Supreme Court justice).

Even the Ch.J. Roberts’ confirmation was as close as smooth, with the usual this-is-how-you-prepare stuff.

By the way – I’m behind on linking this, but Jeffrey Toobin’s article on Ch.J. Roberts’ incrementalism to the right is a must-read. Well-written, but a bit worrisome, depending on your politics.

Toobin does confirm that we don’t really know what we have with a justice yet (see that theory, above) – but he notes that Judge Sotomayor’s backstory kind of resembles the president who selected her).

No doubt, Obama’s taking a chance on her – as Slate’s John Dickerson notes, he knew her least of the judges on his list. Time’s Richard Lacayo analyzes Judge Sotomayor’s work in this article, coming down on how she’s seems to be moderate left of center, but on some things, we probably don’t really know.

But, that’s what makes the US Supreme Ct. so interesting, isn’t it? The odds of things happening in ways we just don’t expect – while kind of being exactly what we expect anyway – if I’m making sense at all.

Hey, who knows – maybe one day, we could be closer to having an Asian in the US S.Ct? (well, we need some more in the circuit courts, so I guess it’s one step at a time?).

Anyway, I’m going to keep reading and watching the coverage, since I’m a junkie on this stuff, but maybe I should stay away before things start to upset me (the mainstream media doesn’t seem all that good at making educational and enlightening coverage for lay people, in my opinion).

Last but not least: North Korea’s getting worrisome; and Slate’s Explainer explains that the US is technically still at war with North Korea (no final peace treaty kind of does mean there’s still something going on between two nations).

Memorial Day Monday

Hope you took a moment to observe the meaning of Memorial Day.

Saturday: saw “Angels and Demons” – nothing spectacular, but Tom Hanks as Prof. Robert Langdon is bearable; Stellan Sarsgaard handles himself well; and Ewan McGregor as a hot priest — mmm! Except for the twist that should have been foreseeable, McGregor was good old fashioned fun.

Sunday: re-watched the Star Trek movie. Still good fun.

Apparently, Slate’s John Dickerson might be a Star Trek fan. Or at least I liked how he ably analyzed the way Obama approaches “empathy” and further elaborated on the whole “Obama is Spock-like” theory.

Really great cover article by Time’s Nancy Gibbs and Michael Scherer about Michelle Obama. I liked these lines: “Maybe this is what women watching her covet: not the clothes or the glamour or the glory, but the fact that she seems to be having a blast, in a way Laura Bush and the rest never did. After working hard for 20 years, she gets to take a sabbatical, spend as much time as she wants with her kids, do as many high-impact public events as she chooses and, when it’s all over, have the rest of her life to write the next chapter.”

Slate presents an alternate universe, where Obama and Friends are on Facebook and posting stuff about those first 100 days. Very funny!

Time.com asking US Dept. of Energy Secretary Steven Chu questions on US energy policy priorities.

So… it was only last week that Time.com got on board with this story about how Big Law Firms are deferring the 1st year associates? The rest of us in the industry have known about this for awhile now. Frankly, the deferred ought to count themselves lucky – when I got out of law school, $60k for that first yr in a non-Big Firm job was good thing. Or maybe the mainstream population ought to start getting scared: if salaries for one industry is starting to drop (or be corrected by market forces), then I’m not sure what can happen to everyone else’s salaries.